<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Above and Beyond KM - Latest Comments in Mind Reading</title><link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://aboveandbeyondkm.disqus.com/mind_reading/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:52:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mind Reading</title><link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/11/mind-reading.html#comment-21857206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't recall the name of the services, but forms of this idea have been around a while.  Even Microsoft's beloved Clippy was a form of this: I see you are doing X, here are some recommendations for assistance. or I see you have been doing Y, I've focused your search on that topic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackvinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mind Reading</title><link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/11/mind-reading.html#comment-21855745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right, Jack.  The frequent requests for a Google-like search often&lt;br&gt;masked a desire for simplicity (and good results, of course) in the face of&lt;br&gt;embarrassingly bad search tools within the enterprise.  However, the folks&lt;br&gt;asking for Google at work didn't always understand exactly what it took&lt;br&gt;Google to deliver simplicity and good results -- millions of dollars spent&lt;br&gt;keeping their algorithms state of the art.  That's an investment most firms&lt;br&gt;are unwilling to make.  Nonetheless, the insistence on having Google at work&lt;br&gt;has led several in the law firm world to work with vendors to create search&lt;br&gt;tools that provide amazing results via a simple interface.  I suspect that&lt;br&gt;the lawyers in the firms that have adopted this approach don't ask for&lt;br&gt;Google anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once services like Pulse become more common, I expect users within the&lt;br&gt;Enterprise will begin to insist that they receive work related information&lt;br&gt;in the same intuitive way.  Search tool vendors will have to deliver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Mary&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VMaryAbraham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mind Reading</title><link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/11/mind-reading.html#comment-21837735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds very similar to the "I want it to be just like Google" arguments from several years ago.  People grow used to a basic service and have difficulty switching to a different way of doing things.  It would be nice if we could provide this to them -- assuming that the advantages of the service make sense in the new situation.  There's the rub.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackvinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:33:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>